I'm trying to get people to change their thinking. Should we really be throwing more hardware at inefficient code? Not all code is inefficient, but some of it is! What is the cost tradeoff? People say, it's ok to throw money at Hardware because it's cheaper than getting a human to fix the code and everybody is over worked and underpaid!
I've always thought that you fix problems at the software level, so that your software runs absolutely efficiently and performs better, but is a new way of thinking? Hardware is cheap (especially in the INTEL /AMD world as compared to the Sun world), developers are expensive? I understand that at one point that it will get significantly more expensive to change the hardware, but till then?
What would you do?
1 comment:
what would I do? outsource the work to a cheaper location!
Post a Comment